Where «nothing to hide» fails as logic

Danah Boyd
Where «nothing to hide» fails as logic

Among those who took the revelation of the US surveillance programs lightly, two arguments prevailed: 1. That surprises you? 2. We need it to fight crime. If you’ve got nothing to hide, you needn’t care. No 1 is just vain, but No 2 needs closer attention. A lot of people seem to think this is just a matter of principles and how reluctant you are to trade them in for increased security. It is not. These two essays by Danah Boyd and Daniel Solove illustrate how everyone is affected, even if they have «nothing to hide».

From Weekly Filet #116, in June 2013.

💔 Some older links might be broken — that's the state of the web, sadly. If you find one, ping me.

Make sense of what matters, today and for the future.

Every Friday, carefully curated recommendations on what to read, watch and listen to. Trusted by thousands of curious minds, since 2011.

Undecided? Learn more | Peek inside