In defence of net zero

A thoughtful riposte to the case against net zero I recommended last week. I like how the author lays out common ground and explicitly acknowledges the valid criticism before making his own point. At its core: «Net zero strategies do not have to be 100 per cent perfect to still deliver meaningful and rapid progress» + «Where is the alternative plan that is more credible than the admittedly flawed and imperfect attempt [of net zero]?». Read it now.